By Stefan Marinov

I'm penning this missive. as i've got learned that it's very unlikely, by means of basic and customarily permitted means.. to make even the smallest break-through within the wall which »established technology« erects to guard itself from innovative adjustments. the hot experiments could be trustworthy. reasonable and simple for execution, the recent theories will be basic, transparent and obvious as air, their mathematical heritage rigorous and comprehensible for kids, however established
science says automatical/_v »no passaran «. Such is fact! i don't intend to debate the massive challenge ll'h_r it's so. I say simply that it's so. every person can convince themselves that i'm correct basically by way of perusing the first111 and secondm volumes of my e-book » The Thorny approach of fact« .
- Stefan Marinov

Show description


Similar nonfiction_6 books


Example text

We as f u n c t i o n a l s over are shall linearly prove t h a t the class independent as functionals they are also l i n e a r l y of analytic boundary v a l u e s b e l o n g i n g t o t h e Holder over independent vector-functions i n D* with class. IB) i n t o | 0 " G ' V f - (2-19) 0 ( 2 . 21) o k k u ( t ) ,. . , u ( t ) also h C u ( t ) , H=m' . the are the solutions solution of this of equation equation. 22) obtain: " * V •lb J 34 " S 3 ? t a . 24) and i(t ). 25) one *(t ) - u(t ) o Hence, ( J ( t ) finds: , t er.

32) condition which and functions teD variables and on D*ur, t o be f o u n d , a n a l y t i c on D*ur, i s analytic In(1-2) with with respect satisfying is to Holder's f(z) is a given i n d o m a i n D* a n d that respect t o z branch of ( i n domain t e r and e q u a l t o z e r o a t z=0. 1 Since class. 1) t o s i n g u l a r inteqral t o zero. 54): Substituting J — r t=ct(z) Integrating both f f sides | e D ( 2 . 3 5 ) , we («(z»- 35! 35) g- with ' C e D ' J = 1 2 ' - 2 < - 3 5 ) obtain: .

9) , t h e n cj(z)=0. n with are simple analytic , . . ,ej (z) ) s a t i s f i e s Let u(z) the theorems. t h e number non-homogeneous I f of numbers. 9). assumed o v e r t h e f i e l d The are g homogeneous e q u a t i o n complex of lemma 2 . 1 . 16) r w h e r e D~ i s t h e c o m p l e m e n t o f D*u Proceeding to the limit at T t o t h e whole z-»t (zeD~) 33 complex p l a n e . 66) we obtain D(t)K(t,t ) d t + - ^ ' . 17), we find t d ( t ) =0, t e r . 1 is proved. 14)): | o(t)f(t)dt, j j = l m;.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.94 of 5 – based on 36 votes